Department of Justice prepares witnesses in Bankman-Fried trial, sheds light on FTX origins ScrgruppEn

The Department of Justice (DOJ) has confirmed its plan to call former FTX clients, investors and employees as witnesses in the upcoming trial involving former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried. This will shed light on how these individuals view their interactions with Bankman Fried and his company.

Ministry of Justice Presenter Proposal letter on September 30, to enable them to obtain witness explanation about FTX’s treatment of client assets, which will be of great importance.

Most importantly, these testimonies are intended to provide valuable perspectives on the interactions between the accused and these witnesses. This initiative also includes their understanding of Bankman-Fried’s observations and conduct, particularly in relation to the management of FTX’s assets. The Department of Justice intends to focus on the experiences of both individual and institutional clients who have entrusted significant assets to FTX with the belief that the platform will securely protect them.

Moreover, there is a distinctive case appeared Regarding a DOJ witness, referred to as “FTX Customer-1,” who resides in Ukraine. Due to the ongoing conflict, there are difficulties associated with traveling to the United States to testify. Thus, the Department of Justice proposed the use of video conferencing as a viable alternative. However, Bankman-Fried’s defense has not yet agreed to this proposal.

However, the legal team representing Bankman-Fried, led by attorney Mark Cohen, expressed concerns about the jury questions posed by the Justice Department. According to Bankman-Fried’s defense, these interrogations suggest guilt on the part of Bankman-Fried, which may undermine the principle of “innocence until proven guilty.”

Additionally, the defense contends that these inquiries may not effectively uncover jurors’ inherent biases, especially if they relate to their personal encounters with cryptocurrencies. Furthermore, some questions may inadvertently direct the jury’s perspective rather than elicit true insights, potentially compromising the impartiality of the trial.

Related: Sam Bankman Fried’s lawyer challenges the questions proposed to the jury by the US government

As jury selection begins on October 3, immediately after the trial, the spotlight is on this high-stakes legal showdown. This case underscores not only its immediate consequences, but also the vital importance of transparent communication and impartial questioning in upholding the principles of justice.

magazine: Deposit Risks: What Do Cryptocurrency Exchanges Do with Your Money?